Resilient LAB 505 Token Whitepaper
English中文
Version 0.1 ¡ Public draft
Status: Public draft
Last updated: 2026-01-19
Repository: TBD
Changelog: #changelog
0. Changelog
DraftLast updated: 2026-01-17
Summary
Change history for the public draft.

Summary

This changelog records material edits to the public draft and policy updates between Nov 2025 and Jan 2026.

Mechanism

Each release increments the version and date. Breaking changes are noted explicitly.

Entries

DateVersionNotes
2025-11-15v0.1.0Initial public outline and scope definition.
2025-12-10v0.1.1Added token utility and marketplace mechanics.
2026-01-17v0.1.2Expanded governance, risks, and parameter registry.

Parameters

namepurposedefaultboundsgovernancecadencetransparency
changelog_cadenceHow often updates are publishedMonthlyTBDPhase 1/2MonthlyPublic notice + log

Rationale

A clear change history improves stakeholder trust and auditability.

Risks & mitigations

  • Stale updates → set a regular publication cadence.
  • Missing edits → require internal review before publishing.

Open questions

  • TODO: Confirm update cadence after private launch.
1. Disclaimer & Risk Notice
DraftLast updated: 2026-01-17
Summary
This document is informational and not investment advice.

Summary

This whitepaper describes the platform and token mechanics at a high level. It is not an offer or solicitation.

Mechanism

Access and participation may be restricted by jurisdictional policy. Token utility is framed as access and resource allocation.

Parameters

namepurposedefaultboundsgovernancecadencetransparency
jurisdiction_policyAllowed regions for accessTBDTBDPhase 1/2As neededPublic notice

Rationale

Clear disclaimers protect users and reduce misinterpretation of utility tokens.

Risks & mitigations

  • Misinterpretation as investment → plain‑language disclosures.
  • Regulatory changes → update access policies.

Open questions

  • TODO: Define jurisdiction list before public launch.
2. Abstract
DraftLast updated: 2026-01-17
Summary
Resilient LAB 505 is a quant research and execution community with tokenized access and incentives.

Summary

The platform combines research tooling, execution support, and a plugin marketplace. The token aligns incentives without being required for basic access.

Mechanism

Users can access public resources freely while premium features require credits or tokens. Contributors earn rewards based on verified impact.

Parameters

namepurposedefaultboundsgovernancecadencetransparency
access_policyDefines public vs premium accessTBDTBDPhase 1QuarterlyPublic notice

Rationale

A hybrid access model broadens adoption while preserving value for advanced users.

Risks & mitigations

  • Low premium conversion → iterate pricing and feature mix.

Open questions

  • TODO: Finalize public vs premium feature list.
3. Introduction
DraftLast updated: 2026-01-17
Summary
Defines the target users and platform scope.

Summary

The platform targets quant researchers, systematic traders, and infrastructure builders who value reproducibility and verified performance.

Mechanism

Documentation, templates, and tooling standardize how strategies are developed, shared, and reviewed.

Parameters

namepurposedefaultboundsgovernancecadencetransparency
content_standardsMinimum submission metadataTBDTBDPhase 1QuarterlyPublic spec

Rationale

Clear audience and standards reduce noise and improve contribution quality.

Risks & mitigations

  • Scope creep → maintain a stable core module roadmap.

Open questions

  • TODO: Publish initial submission standards.
4. Problem Statement
DraftLast updated: 2026-01-17
Summary
Quant communities lack verifiable incentives and reliable quality control.

Summary

Existing communities suffer from unverifiable claims, weak incentives, and limited reproducibility.

Mechanism

A shared reputation system and usage‑based metrics address coordination and quality challenges.

Parameters

namepurposedefaultboundsgovernancecadencetransparency
reputation_weightInfluence of reputation on rewardsTBD0–1Phase 2QuarterlyPublic notice

Rationale

Without verified usage, rewards can be gamed and trust decays.

Risks & mitigations

  • Reputation capture → require review diversity and caps.

Open questions

  • TODO: Define baseline reviewer reputation model.
5. Solution Overview
DraftLast updated: 2026-01-17
Summary
A platform that combines research tooling, execution support, and a verified marketplace.

Summary

Resilient LAB 505 merges research workflows with execution tooling and a marketplace built on verifiable usage.

Mechanism

Verified usage receipts and reviewer scores determine rewards and ranking.

Parameters

namepurposedefaultboundsgovernancecadencetransparency
receipt_weightWeight of usage receiptsTBD0–1Phase 2QuarterlyPublic notice

Rationale

Utility‑driven incentives align creators and users without requiring speculative behavior.

Risks & mitigations

  • Insufficient data quality → enforce reproducibility standards.

Open questions

  • TODO: Publish receipt format and privacy policy.
6. Product & Technical Architecture
DraftLast updated: 2026-01-17
Summary
High‑level components and data flows.

Summary

The architecture includes research tooling, execution tooling, marketplace, and reputation layers.

Mechanism

Data flows from usage receipts and reviews into the reputation engine, which influences rewards.

Parameters

namepurposedefaultboundsgovernancecadencetransparency
receipt_retention_daysRetention of usage receiptsTBD30–365Phase 2AnnualPublic policy

Rationale

Clear modular boundaries simplify audits, scalability, and security.

Risks & mitigations

  • Integration complexity → keep interfaces narrow and versioned.

Open questions

  • TODO: Publish a public architecture diagram.
7. Token Overview
DraftLast updated: 2026-01-17
Summary
Purpose, design principles, and non‑goals.

Summary

The token allocates scarce platform resources and aligns incentives. It is not a profit‑sharing instrument.

Mechanism

Token usage is tied to premium actions, marketplace purchases, and staking roles.

Parameters

namepurposedefaultboundsgovernancecadencetransparency
token_standardToken standard (e.g., ERC‑20)TBDN/APhase 1One‑timePublic spec

Rationale

Clear non‑goals reduce misinterpretation and compliance risk.

Risks & mitigations

  • Misaligned incentives → maintain utility‑first policy.

Open questions

  • TODO: Confirm chain and token standard.
8. Tokenomics
DraftLast updated: 2026-01-19
Summary
Fixed supply with detailed allocations, vesting, and TGE float plan.

Summary

Fixed supply of 505,000,000 tokens with a stable allocation profile based on median references from successful L2 and GameFi projects. Team allocation is capped at 15% and the target TGE float is 10–15%.

Allocation (detailed draft)

bucket%tokenssub‑bucketsub‑%tokens
Community + Ecosystem50%252,500,000User incentives20%101,000,000
Builder grants10%50,500,000
Liquidity mining (non‑LP)8%40,400,000
Partnerships & integrations7%35,350,000
Public goods / research5%25,250,000
Team + Advisors15%75,750,000Core team12%60,600,000
Advisors3%15,150,000
Investors (incl. Early Commit)20%101,000,000Early Commit0.5%2,525,000
Private / Strategic19.5%98,475,000
Public Sale + Liquidity10%50,500,000Public sale6%30,300,000
Liquidity / MM4%20,200,000
Treasury / Foundation5%25,250,000Treasury reserve3%15,150,000
Foundation ops2%10,100,000

TGE float composition (target 10–15%)

sourceindicative % of total supplynotes
Public sale5–6%50% at TGE + 3‑month linear
Liquidity / MM3–4%LP lock: 365 days with on‑chain proof
Ecosystem bootstrap1–2%Small initial incentives
Early Commit0.05%10% of Early Commit unlocked at TGE

Vesting & unlock schedule (draft)

Team + Advisors (15%)

  • Cliff: 12 months
  • Vesting: 36–48 months linear, monthly
  • TGE unlock: 0%

Private / Strategic (19.5%)

  • Cliff: 12 months
  • Vesting: 24–36 months linear, monthly
  • TGE unlock: 5–10% (finalized per round)

Early Commit (0.5%)

  • TGE unlock: 10%
  • Vesting: 6 months linear
  • Per‑wallet cap: 0.2 BNB

Public Sale (6%)

  • TGE unlock: 50%
  • Remainder: 3 months linear

Liquidity / MM (4%)

  • Locked LP: 365 days, public proof of lock
  • Release: governed by market‑making KPI and governance vote

Community + Ecosystem (50%)

  • Programmatic release over 36–48 months
  • Quarterly budgets, transparent reporting

Treasury / Foundation (5%)

  • Reserve for governance, audits, operations
  • Release by proposal and public reporting

Supply and FDV references

FDV price reference using total supply:

  • $20M FDV → ~$0.0396
  • $50M FDV → ~$0.0990
  • $100M FDV → ~$0.1980

Parameters

namepurposedefaultboundsgovernancecadencetransparency
total_supplyTotal fixed supply505,000,000FixedPhase 1One‑timePublic notice
team_capTeam + advisors cap15%10–20%Phase 1One‑timePublic notice
tge_float_targetTGE circulating target10–15%8–20%Phase 1One‑timePublic notice
early_commitment_shareEarly commit allocation0.5%0–2%Phase 1One‑timePublic notice
vesting_team_monthsTeam vesting36–4824–60Phase 1MonthlyPublic schedule
vesting_investor_monthsInvestor vesting24–3612–48Phase 1MonthlyPublic schedule
lp_lock_daysLP lock180–36590–1,095Phase 1One‑timePublic proof

Rationale

Stable allocations prioritize long‑term ecosystem growth while capping team dilution.

Risks & mitigations

  • Allocation skepticism → publish full vesting schedules and on‑chain lock proofs.
  • Short‑term sell pressure → keep TGE float within target range and use staged releases.

Open questions

  • Finalize public sale unlock (50–100%).
9. Utility & Mechanisms
DraftLast updated: 2026-01-17
Summary
Access, marketplace, staking, and bond mechanics.

Summary

Token utility covers premium access, marketplace payments, and staking‑based roles.

Mechanism

Credits are granted via subscriptions; tokens are consumed for premium actions and staking locks.

Parameters

namepurposedefaultboundsgovernancecadencetransparency
credit_per_planMonthly credits by planTBDTBDPhase 1QuarterlyPublic notice
premium_action_costCost per premium actionTBDTBDPhase 2QuarterlyPublic notice
creator_stake_minListing stake minimumTBDTBDPhase 2QuarterlyPublic notice

Rationale

Utility‑first design supports sustainable usage and reduces speculation.

Risks & mitigations

  • Confusing pricing → publish a clear pricing table.

Open questions

  • TODO: Define credit rollover and expiry.
10. Rewards System
DraftLast updated: 2026-01-17
Summary
Impact‑weighted rewards with anti‑gaming controls.

Summary

Rewards are based on verified usage, retention, and reputation‑weighted ratings.

Mechanism

Usage receipts and reviewer scores feed into periodic reward epochs.

Parameters

namepurposedefaultboundsgovernancecadencetransparency
reward_epoch_daysReward cycle lengthTBD7–90Phase 2QuarterlyPublic notice
reward_pool_releaseMonthly release rateTBDTBDPhase 2QuarterlyPublic report

Rationale

Quantifying impact reduces gaming and improves contributor quality.

Risks & mitigations

  • Sybil attacks → staking and unique user caps.

Open questions

  • TODO: Define receipt verification method.
11. Governance
DraftLast updated: 2026-01-17
Summary
Phased governance with proposal lifecycle and timelock.

Summary

Governance starts with product priorities and expands to treasury ranges and protocol changes.

Mechanism

Proposal lifecycle: draft → discussion → vote → timelock → execution, with emergency controls.

Parameters

namepurposedefaultboundsgovernancecadencetransparency
quorum_pctVoting quorumTBD5–25%Phase 2QuarterlyPublic notice
timelock_daysExecution delayTBD1–14Phase 2QuarterlyPublic notice

Rationale

Phased governance limits risk while the product matures.

Risks & mitigations

  • Low participation → delegation support and clear governance education.

Open questions

  • TODO: Select final voting model (token‑weighted vs delegated).
12. Security & Operations
DraftLast updated: 2026-01-17
Summary
Audits, bug bounties, and operational controls.

Summary

Security includes contract audits, bug bounties, and operational safeguards.

Mechanism

Critical flows are subject to manual review, rate limits, and public incident reporting.

Parameters

namepurposedefaultboundsgovernancecadencetransparency
audit_requirementAudit before public launchRequiredN/APhase 1One‑timePublic report
bounty_budgetAnnual bug bounty budgetTBDTBDPhase 2AnnualPublic report

Rationale

Operational transparency increases trust and reduces systemic risk.

Risks & mitigations

  • Audit gaps → staged releases and time‑boxed upgrades.

Open questions

  • TODO: Define bounty scope.
13. Legal/Compliance Posture
DraftLast updated: 2026-01-17
Summary
Access policies and compliance controls.

Summary

Access may be restricted by jurisdiction. KYC/AML may apply to certain tiers.

Mechanism

Policies are defined and updated with public notice and changelog entries.

Parameters

namepurposedefaultboundsgovernancecadencetransparency
kyc_thresholdTier requiring KYCTBDTBDPhase 2As neededPublic notice

Rationale

A compliance posture reduces legal risk and supports sustainable growth.

Risks & mitigations

  • Policy changes → clear advance notice.

Open questions

  • TODO: Define KYC thresholds for private allocation tiers.
14. Risks & Mitigations
DraftLast updated: 2026-01-17
Summary
Formal risk register with mitigation and residual risk.

Summary

This section records key risks and mitigations for market, technical, and operational domains.

Mechanism

Risks are reviewed periodically and updated with mitigation status.

Parameters

namepurposedefaultboundsgovernancecadencetransparency
risk_review_cadenceReview frequencyQuarterlyMonthly–QuarterlyPhase 2QuarterlyPublic log

Rationale

A risk register improves accountability and prioritization.

Risks & mitigations

RiskCategorySeverityLikelihoodMitigationResidual risk
Market regime shiftMarketHighMedForward‑testing and disclosureMed
Backtest overfittingTechnicalMedMedReproducibility checksLow–Med
Smart contract bugSmart ContractHighLow–MedAudits + staged releasesMed
Malicious plugin supply chainOperationalHighMedReview + sandboxing + slashingMed
Data exfiltrationOperationalMedLow–MedSandbox + permissioningLow–Med
Collusion in reviewsGovernanceMedLow–MedReputation weighting + capsLow–Med

Open questions

  • TODO: Publish annual risk review process.
15. Roadmap & Milestones
DraftLast updated: 2026-01-17
Summary
Launch milestones and validation gates.

Summary

Roadmap milestones align with product readiness and community validation.

Mechanism

Milestones unlock governance scope and resource expansion.

Parameters

namepurposedefaultboundsgovernancecadencetransparency
expansion_thresholdUsage needed for expansionTBDTBDPhase 2QuarterlyPublic notice

Rationale

Milestone gating reduces risk and ensures stable scaling.

Risks & mitigations

  • Delayed milestones → publish progress updates.

Open questions

  • TODO: Define quantitative thresholds for chain expansion.
16. Appendix (Parameter Registry)
DraftLast updated: 2026-01-17
Summary
Registry of adjustable parameters and governance controls.

Summary

This registry tracks adjustable parameters, governance phase, and transparency rules.

Mechanism

Parameter changes require public notice and changelog entries.

Parameters

namepurposedefaultboundswho_can_changecadencetransparency
credit_per_planMonthly credits by planTBDTBDPhase 1/2QuarterlyPublic notice
premium_action_costCost per premium actionTBDTBDPhase 2QuarterlyPublic notice
api_rate_limit_tierRate limit per tierTBDTBDPhase 1QuarterlyPublic notice
creator_stake_minListing stake minimumTBDTBDPhase 2QuarterlyPublic notice
reviewer_stake_minReviewer stake minimumTBDTBDPhase 2QuarterlyPublic notice
proposal_bondAnti‑spam bondTBDTBDPhase 2QuarterlyPublic notice
listing_bondListing bondTBDTBDPhase 2QuarterlyPublic notice
reward_epoch_daysReward cycle lengthTBD7–90Phase 2QuarterlyPublic notice
reward_pool_releaseReward release rateTBDTBDPhase 2QuarterlyPublic report
quorum_pctGovernance quorumTBD5–25%Phase 2QuarterlyPublic notice
timelock_daysGovernance timelockTBD1–14Phase 2QuarterlyPublic notice
slashing_thresholdSlashing triggerTBDTBDPhase 2QuarterlyPublic notice
treasury_budget_capTreasury spending capTBDTBDPhase 2QuarterlyPublic report
liquidity_lock_daysLiquidity lockTBD180–1095Phase 1One‑timePublic proof

Rationale

A single registry reduces ambiguity and helps governance remain transparent.

Risks & mitigations

  • Parameter drift → enforce notice periods.

Open questions

  • TODO: Finalize parameter bounds.
17. Diagrams
DraftLast updated: 2026-01-19
Summary
System, token flow, and allocation diagrams.

Summary

The following diagrams visualize token flows, governance lifecycle, and token allocation/vesting.

Mechanism

Mermaid diagrams reflect the mechanics described in this whitepaper.

Parameters

namepurposedefaultboundsgovernancecadencetransparency
diagram_refreshUpdate cadenceQuarterlyMonthly–QuarterlyPhase 1QuarterlyPublic notice

Rationale

Diagrams improve clarity and reduce misinterpretation.

Risks & mitigations

  • Diagram drift → update alongside changelog.

Open questions

  • TODO: Add detailed data‑flow diagram after beta.

Token allocation (draft)

Token allocation pie chart
Token allocation pie chart

Community + ecosystem breakdown (draft)

Community and ecosystem breakdown pie chart
Community and ecosystem breakdown pie chart

Vesting overview (draft)

Vesting overview diagram
Vesting overview diagram
Token flow diagram
Token flow diagram
Governance lifecycle diagram
Governance lifecycle diagram
Marketplace verification diagram
Marketplace verification diagram